,

Telegram Joins the Dark Side – Alleged Privacy Policy Changes Raise Concerns

Telegram privacy policy changes allegedly allow more targeted ads based on user data, sparking backlash over privacy concerns.
Telegram privacy policy changes allegedly allow more targeted ads based on user data, sparking backlash over privacy concerns.

Table of Contents

Introduction

A few hours ago, a concerning post appeared on Dread, a popular Reddit-like darknet forum, claiming that the messaging app Telegram is going to update privacy policy to allow more targeted ads for users

 

Telegram Privacy Policy changes

According to the post, the alleged Telegram privacy policy changes would include:

  • Personalized ads will be unique for each user based on the data collected about them.
  • For personalized ads, Telegram will analyze IP addresses, down to the city, and will analyze users’ interests based on search queries, subscriptions and contacts, and data “collected from other platforms.”
  • Personalized ads will also appear in private channels.
  • A “list of identification numbers based on the phone numbers of platform users” will also be used for personalized ads.

Users apparently have to subscribe to Telegram Premium to avoid personalized ads and data collection. This indicates a pay-to-privacy model at odds with Telegram’s original ethos.

While Telegram’s public privacy policy does not currently reflect these alleged changes, they may be coming soon if the claims are valid, even though we all hope it’s just a big fad. This represents a dramatic shift for a messaging app branded as a more privacy-focused alternative to apps like WhatsApp.

 

Implications for User’s Privacy and Surveillance Concerns

These alleged Telegram privacy policy updates raise several concerns about user privacy and potential surveillance:

  • Granular targeting of ads based on sensitive information like searches and contacts
  • Monetizing and commercializing private conversations
  • Expanded data collection and retention, possibly shared with advertisers
  • Requiring paid premium accounts just to opt-out of tracking
  • Increased metadata like IPs and phone numbers available for monitoring users

For an app that touted encrypted messaging and anonymized data, these ads-related changes contradict Telegram’s original principles. User trust in the platform’s privacy safeguards seems likely to erode as a result.

Some privacy advocates have recommended avoiding Telegram entirely or only using it with anonymity-enhancing tools like Whonix or Tails to mitigate risks. But Telegram alternatives like Signal offers end-to-end encryption without personalized ads at all. Who knows what’s safe though, maybe we should all move back to the golden IRC days.

 

Telegram’s journey to the Dark Side?

Telegram has deviated before from its early open-source, privacy-first vision, like removing encryption from group chats and cloud chats in 2020. But enabling personalized ads based on user data is perhaps its most dramatic shift yet. 

Founder Pavel Durov originally positioned Telegram as a safer messaging alternative to WhatsApp after distancing himself from VKontakte, Russia’s Facebook equivalent. Now Telegram seems to be gradually embracing a surveillance capitalist business model rivaling Facebook and Google.

With over 500 million monthly active users as of 2021, Telegram has grown into a leading global messaging platform. But this growth may be coming at the cost of the privacy protections that first drew in many users. If the alleged ad-related policy changes come to pass, it could signify Telegram’s transition to the dark side.

 

What Users Can Do

While the Telegram privacy policy updates remain unconfirmed, concerned users do have options:

  • Refrain from searching or engaging with sensitive topics on Telegram
  • Review Telegram’s privacy settings and turn off any unnecessary data sharing
  • Use a VPN or anonymity network like Tor when accessing Telegram
  • Switch to more privacy-focused messaging apps like Signal
  • Delete Telegram if the alleged changes materialize and undermine personal privacy

The coming days and weeks should reveal whether Telegram is actually implementing the advertised surveillance and monetization model described.

Users concerned about privacy must closely evaluate Telegram’s direction and practices moving forward. If the platform abandons its privacy principles as alleged, migrating to alternatives may become necessary to avoid being engulfed by the dark side.


Article created by Cosimo Miccolis.

Sponsored content

Related Articles

DEXTools' Token Creator allows teams to easily and securely launch tokens without coding or costly audits, enhancing DeFi project visibility and security.
Learn about Banana Gun's rapid rise in the trading bot niche, with remarkable growth in trading volumes, users, and revenues in under a year.
Learn how to track liquidity pools and token unlocks on DEXTools. Discover essential insights to make informed trading decisions.

See All